WhichEV.Net
  • Buying Advice
  • EV Answers
  • Features
  • News
    • All
    • Charging
    • Commercial Vehicles
    • Consumer Vehicles
    • Cool Car Tech
    • Curiosities
    • Design
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Industry
    • Legal
    • Market
    • Motorsport
    • Public Sector
    • Records
    • Rumours
    • Safety
    • Sharing
    • Solar

    Caterham Reveals First Functional Project V Prototype Ahead of 2026 Tokyo Auto Salon Debut

    Updated XPENG G6 Confirmed for UK Launch in 2026 with 12-Minute Ultra-Rapid Charging and New AWD Performance Flagship

    QuantumScape Completes Eagle Pilot Line as Solid-State EV Battery Manufacturing Moves Closer to Scale

    Škoda Reimagines Its First Million Seller as Bold EV Concept for the Modern Solid Era

    Alpine, Renault Unlock Top-Tier £3,750 Electric Car Grant Across New ‘+’ Line-ups

    Global EV Fleet to Hit 116 Million in 2026 Despite Policy Headwinds, Says Gartner

    Trending Tags

  • Reviews
No Result
View All Result
WhichEV.Net
  • Buying Advice
  • EV Answers
  • Features
  • News
    • All
    • Charging
    • Commercial Vehicles
    • Consumer Vehicles
    • Cool Car Tech
    • Curiosities
    • Design
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Industry
    • Legal
    • Market
    • Motorsport
    • Public Sector
    • Records
    • Rumours
    • Safety
    • Sharing
    • Solar

    Caterham Reveals First Functional Project V Prototype Ahead of 2026 Tokyo Auto Salon Debut

    Updated XPENG G6 Confirmed for UK Launch in 2026 with 12-Minute Ultra-Rapid Charging and New AWD Performance Flagship

    QuantumScape Completes Eagle Pilot Line as Solid-State EV Battery Manufacturing Moves Closer to Scale

    Škoda Reimagines Its First Million Seller as Bold EV Concept for the Modern Solid Era

    Alpine, Renault Unlock Top-Tier £3,750 Electric Car Grant Across New ‘+’ Line-ups

    Global EV Fleet to Hit 116 Million in 2026 Despite Policy Headwinds, Says Gartner

    Trending Tags

  • Reviews
No Result
View All Result
WhichEV.Net
No Result
View All Result
Home Reviews Electric Vehicles

MG Cyberster 2024 Review

Finally, an all-electric roadster – and it’s superb

James Morris by James Morris
17th July 2024
in Electric Vehicles, Reviews
Reading Time: 10 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

1. Intro, Price, Options and Verdict

  • 1. Intro, Price, Options and Verdict
  • 2. Design, Comfort and Storage
  • 3. In-Car Entertainment and Controls
  • 4. Performance, Running Costs, Range, and Safety
  • 5. Key Specifications
90 / 100 Overall
£54,995 inc VATPrice as Reviewed£673.73 exc VATBusiness Lease
Pros
  • First mainstream electric roadster
  • GT version is very quick
  • Eye-catching looks
Cons
  • Satnav screen is obscured by the steering wheel
  • Needs a few more paint colour choices
  • No wireless phone charging
Verdict
There’s no EV to compare to the MG Cyberster. The only roadsters in this class are petrol-powered. The fact that the Cyberster competes well even with these shows just how competitively priced it is. This is still the most expensive electric MG yet, but with the satnav positioning niggle aside, this is a brilliant sportscar for the money, with great performance to match its looks, and a true modern electrified expression of what the MG brand historically has been all about.
Range (WLTP): Trophy - 316 miles; GT - 276 miles Top Speed: Trophy - 121; GT - 124mph 0 to 62: Trophy - 5 secs; GT - 3.2 secs Efficiency: Trophy 4.2 miles per kWh; GT - 3.7 miles per kWh

City Driving
Fun Factor
Practicality
Design & Tech
Value

Introduction

MG used to be famous for open-topped sportscars, but under various iterations of Rover the brand became more of a purveyor of slightly sporty family saloons. The MG F and TF were a minor return to form but haven’t been manufactured since 2011. Now, under Chinese SAIC ownership, MG is back with a new roadster, only this time it’s electric. The Cyberster has been one of the most hotly anticipated EVs of the last couple of years. Can it live up to expectations, and the tradition of the MG brand?

Price and Options

Although the Cyberster is a much more premium car than previous electric MGs, the options have still been kept as simple as possible. In fact, there are just two main drivetrain choices – the Trophy and the GT. The Trophy is rear-wheel drive with 335hp, and the GT all-wheel drive with a whopping 503hp. Both use the same 77kWh battery, like the MG4 Extended Range.

It should be noted that Trophy is usually MG’s top trim level, so both cars are fully loaded with features, and there’s no “poverty spec” option. Other than the drivetrain, the only real difference between the two versions is that you get 19in wheels as standard with the Trophy and 20in with the GT, using different alloy designs for each.

The basic colour is called New English White, which is a rather attractive slightly creamy ivory hue. Then there’s Camden Grey and Cosmic Silver for £545 extra. The signature Dynamic Red and Inca Yellow are £695. You can choose a black or red soft top, with the latter costing £500, but it’s not available with the red or yellow paint, presumably because it would clash. The Cyberster could have had a few more paint choices, with British Racing Green the obvious choice, or the rather attractive hue of the Cyber GTS prototype revealed at Goodwood Festival of Speed.

There are two interior choices, with no premium for either. There’s red or grey “leather style” material with black trim and Alcantara inserts. There are no option packs, so the ordering process is simple, and you won’t add a lot to the base prices – which is where the Cyberster really gets interesting. Bearing in mind that this is a fast, well equipped open-topped EV with scissor doors and good range, and the Trophy’s starting price of £54,995 doesn’t look that excessive. You only pay £5,000 more, or £59,995 in total, for the GT.

Comparing this to petrol equivalents puts the Cyberster’s pricing in perspective. Sure, the Mazda MX5 is much cheaper, and it’s an incredibly fun vehicle, but its performance is not in the same league as the Cyberster Trophy. The most obvious comparisons are the BMW Z4 and Jaguar F-Type (although that’s no longer available to buy new). Even the F-Type SVR isn’t as quick as the Cyberster GT, and the fastest Z4 M40i is only marginally quicker than the Trophy. You’d pay a lot more for either, purchased new, showing that, while the MG Cyberster is not cheap, you’re not paying a premium for an EV for once. If you have a hankering for a truly quick electric roadster, the MG Cyberster means petrol is not the cheaper option.

Exterior Design

Amazingly, the Cyberster’s design is not as far from the concept unveiled at the 2021 Shanghai Auto Show as you might expect. It retains the scissor doors and sloping nose of the original design, although the latter is not so aggressive in the production version. The rear is also simplified, with a less pronounced spoiler and light bars, but you still get the arrow-shaped tail lights.

The result is less like something out of an anime cartoon and more like a car you won’t feel self-conscious to own. That is, until you open the scissor doors, which are as ostentatious as you’d expect. They’re not mere impractical nonsense, however. Not only do they make it easy to get into the car, but they also don’t swing that far out, so opening them in a parking space isn’t impossible. The doors open automatically, either using the key, a button on the door, or a switch in the central console. There are ultrasonic sensors on the panel to prevent collision.

Perhaps the most incredible thing about the Cyberster is that, despite having its batteries under the floor in typical “skateboard” EV style, it doesn’t sit high like most electric cars. This is because the battery pack is just 110mm thick. In fact, apart from the lack of tailpipe and silence, you wouldn’t know the Cyberster was an EV if you didn’t already. The soft roof is also slickly executed, only taking 15 seconds to raise or lower, which you can do at up to 30 mph.

Overall, the Cyberster is a great-looking car, and will provide the sense of occasion that is the reason why you bought a roadster instead of a more practical car format.

Interior Comfort

The Cyberster is a two-seater, and the central console is quite high. But it doesn’t feel cramped inside. In the driver’s position, you’re surrounded by a bevy of screens, so there is a strong sense of being a pilot in a cockpit.

The grey interior is a little plain, and the red version showier, but still quite classy. An all-black option could have been a welcome addition to the range of choices. The seats are comfortable for hours of driving, which is what you want in a car that is more of a very fast grand tourer than an uncompromising racer. The electric adjustment buttons are on the door, the seats are heated, and so is the steering wheel.

You get a decent amount of space in the central console cubby, and a couple of cupholders. However, one bizarre omission is a wireless phone charging pad. While these are admittedly not great at the best of times, not having one is a surprising omission.

Dropping the top is easy. There’s a wind deflector included with UK cars and with the windows up but the roof down there’s a nice sense of airflow without too much turbulence or wind noise. In fact, on windy A-roads the Cyberster feels just the way a roadster should inside.

Storage and Load Carrying

Two-seater soft-tops are not famous for their luggage space, and the MG Cyberster is typical in this respect. With the largest electric motor at the back, the boot is shallow. However, the total capacity is 249 litres, enough for some shopping or a couple of overnight bags.

Crucially, you can just about fit a set of golf clubs inside. Unsurprisingly, you can’t drop the rear seats forward to extend capacity, because there aren’t any rear seats. There’s no word about towing, which would also be a bit silly for a roadster, unless it’s some jet skis.

With each generation, MG has incrementally improved its infotainment. The Cyberster does not just grab the latest iteration out of the parts bin, however. There is very little resemblance to any previous MGs. There are four LCD panels and a collection of buttons. Three of the panels sit behind the steering wheel and one in portrait mode in the central console.

You turn the car on by simply pressing the brake pedal with the keys inside the vehicle. A column of large buttons selects drive, neutral, reverse and park. Below are switches for the doors and roof, with some discrete buttons for key air conditioning features in the dashboard above. The central screen then provides access to settings and fine tuning of climate controls.

One of the key features provided by this central screen is control over the motor power and setup. There are Comfort, Sport, Track and Custom, where you can adjust features like motor power and steering feel independently.

One thing this central screen doesn’t operate, however,  is media. This comes via the left-hand screen behind the steering wheel. This also shows the sat-nav and Apple Car Play or Android Auto. The right-hand screen offers energy-related information such as consumption graphs and vehicle-to-load. The central screen provides a digital speed readout, safety messages, and range.

The steering wheel is bristling with buttons. It has media and menu controls on either side, and paddles for quickly changing modes or regeneration levels. Then there are conventional stalks for lights and indicators as well as windscreen wipers. Two large round buttons underneath the central spoke operate the adaptive cruise control and Supersport mode, which takes the performance one step further than Sport.

However, there is one snafu with the Cyberster’s array of entertainment screens. While this is another feature that hasn’t changed significantly since the concept, the steering wheel has. We’re not fans of yokes, but the concept had one and the dashboard panels were clearly designed with a yoke in mind because the top sides of the steering wheel obscure the left and right panels. This isn’t so bad with the right-hand screen, which has information you won’t need to use live when driving. But the left-hand one shows the satnav map, which the wheel and your hand will obscure, leaving you to crane your head around to see it. You might find yourself mounting your phone on the windscreen instead.

Performance and Driving

Plenty of sportscars look great but don’t drive like it. Many are underpowered, or don’t handle any better than a regular car. Not so the MG Cyberster. Both versions of the Cyberster are quick. The Trophy takes just 5 seconds to hit 62mph, but the GT drops the time to an incredible 3.2 seconds, similar to a Tesla Model 3 Performance. However, to hit these figures you need to switch the car into Supersport and invoke launch control. Even when not launching, the GT feels like it could overtake anything in a flash on an A-road, whereas the Trophy is more sedate.

The two versions of the Cyberster drive subtly differently beyond the mere difference in speed, too. The Trophy is 100kg lighter than the GT – 1,885kg versus 1,985kg. While the GT has perfect 50-50 distribution, the Trophy is biased to the rear 51-49. This isn’t noticeable in use – there’s no clear rear bias or tail happiness with the Trophy. But the Trophy has lighter steering and feels like a more relaxed grand tourer, whereas the GT is tighter and more urgent in corners. Neither Cyberster is a track car in its current form, but the GT in particular is incredibly assured on the road even in damp conditions. It inspires the confidence to drive fast.

But the Cyberster is not a challenging car in any way. It’s very smooth and easy to drive in any situation, including narrow town streets. Although the two seats and small boot hardly make this a practical car, it’s easy to live with. It wouldn’t have to be a weekend special for high days and holidays. It could easily be your daily driver.

Range and Charging

With a 77kWh (gross) battery on board (74.4kWh net), the MG Cyberster doesn’t skimp on range. The rear-wheel drive Trophy has a WLTP rating of 316 miles, while the all-wheel drive GT drops to 276 WLT miles. Of course, this is a car that cries out not to be driven efficiently, and when we drove it around hilly and windy Scottish roads, the GT managed just 2.2 miles per kWh and the Trophy 2.5 miles per kWh, for a real-world range of 170 miles and 193 miles respectively.

You probably won’t drive quite this exuberantly, so expect closer to 200 miles with the GT and over 200 miles with the Trophy. These aren’t earthshattering range figures, but enough for grand touring. The DC charging is a bit behind the best at 150kW (or 144kW in some specifications), meaning replenishing from 10 to 80% will take 38 minutes. A break this long every 2-3 hours is just about right, although the Cyberster won’t challenge a Tesla for long-distance journeys. AC charging remains at 7kW, so a full battery from empty at home will take a little over 10 hours.

Running Costs

The official WLTP range gives an efficiency of 4.2 miles per kWh for the Trophy and 3.7 miles per kWh for the GT, but as already stated we saw more like 2.5 and 2.2 miles per kWh respectively when driving (very) brusquely. That’s still not going to be expensive with mostly home charging.

The warranty is the typical one from MG – 7 years or 80,000 miles, whichever comes first, including the battery. There’s no mention of minimum capacity for the latter, however. Insurance groups hadn’t been announced at the time of writing but expect them to be high.

Safety

Despite the significant design departure of the Cyberster from other electric MGs, the safety tech is similar to other recent vehicles, although there’s no Euro NCAP rating yet. MG Pilot now includes Adaptive Cruise Control with traffic stop and go, which you call up with one of the big round buttons on the steering wheel.

There's speed limit assistance with sign recognition. You get active emergency braking, auto high beams, and blind spot detection. That's shown with the same orange lights on the wing mirrors as are used for indicating. There’s also a 360-degree parking camera.

There's Lane Keep Assist and Lane Change Assist, which is an extension of blind spot detection, but doesn’t give the adaptive cruise control fully autosteering capabilities. Rear Cross Traffic Alert will help you avoid collisions when backing out of a park spot and you haven't seen someone driving past behind you, however.

Price: Trophy – £54,995; GT – £59,995
Range (WLTP): Trophy – 316 miles; GT – 276 miles
Charge time (7.4kW): 10.3 hours
Charge time (50kW, 80%): 61 minutes
Charge time (250kW, 80%): 38 minutes
Battery: 77kWh (74.4kWh usable)
On Board Charger: AC: 7kW; DC: 144kW
Efficiency (WLTP): Trophy – 4.2 miles per kWh; GT – 3.7 miles per kWh
0-62mph: Trophy – 5 seconds; GT – 3.2 seconds
Top Speed: Trophy – 121 mph; GT – 124 mph
Power: Trophy – 335hp; GT – 503hp
Wheels driven: Trophy – Rear-wheel drive; GT – All-wheel drive
Cargo: 249 litres

1. Intro, Price, Options and Verdict

  • 1. Intro, Price, Options and Verdict
  • 2. Design, Comfort and Storage
  • 3. In-Car Entertainment and Controls
  • 4. Performance, Running Costs, Range, and Safety
  • 5. Key Specifications
Previous
Next Design, Comfort and Storage
Tags: MGMG Cyberster
Previous Post

Dacia launches highly affordable Spring in the UK from £14,995

Next Post

Renault launches the new Trafic E-Tech electric van

James Morris

James Morris

Editor With over 25 years’ experience as a technology journalist and a life-long love of cars, Dr James Morris initially saw the potential for electric vehicles when he became one of the first people to drive a Nissan Leaf back in 2011. He presently owns a Tesla Model 3 Performance and a plug-in Mercedes C350e Estate. He loves how automotive design and gadgetry combine in EVs, making them both fun and technically fascinating at the same time. Alongside being editor of WhichEV, he contributes to Forbes.com on electric vehicles and is Pathway Director of the Masters in Interactive Journalism at City, University of London.

Related Posts

Humax MX7 Home EV Charger 2026 Review

10th November 2025

Jaecoo E5 2026 Review

4th November 2025

Abarth 600e 2025 Review

14th October 2025

Hyundai Inster 2025 Review

12th September 2025
Next Post

Renault launches the new Trafic E-Tech electric van

Discussion about this post

Select a Review

Latest News

Caterham Reveals First Functional Project V Prototype Ahead of 2026 Tokyo Auto Salon Debut

12th December 2025

Updated XPENG G6 Confirmed for UK Launch in 2026 with 12-Minute Ultra-Rapid Charging and New AWD Performance Flagship

11th December 2025

QuantumScape Completes Eagle Pilot Line as Solid-State EV Battery Manufacturing Moves Closer to Scale

10th December 2025

Trending

  • Future electric cars: Best upcoming electric cars, SUVs and pickup trucks – 2021 UPDATE!

    1542 shares
    Share 633 Tweet 379
  • How to turn your favourite classic car into an EV

    1496 shares
    Share 615 Tweet 367
  • Octopus Electric Vehicles launches an all-in-one EV bundle

    1439 shares
    Share 576 Tweet 360
  • What makes an EV charging station accessible for people with disabilities?

    1374 shares
    Share 550 Tweet 344
  • WhichEV Awards 2020: The Year’s Best EVs

    1220 shares
    Share 494 Tweet 303
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact the WhichEV team today

© 2022 WhichEV. Limited - All of the independent news and expert reviews you need in one publication.

No Result
View All Result
  • Buying Advice
  • EV Answers
  • Features
  • News
  • Reviews

© 2022 WhichEV. Limited - All of the independent news and expert reviews you need in one publication.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.